Comments on: Basics - Why should you use the RAW format for photo editing

By: julie70

julie70 — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:21:01 +0000

Je voulais comprendre à quoi sert Raw, je comment à piger de ton papier, il y a un Raw aussi Sony, avec un compact portable facilement?

Je crois avoir acheté le photoshop elements 5 qui dit traiter des Raw, certains au moins, où je peux trouver des images Raw pour essayer, jouer avec? tester les possibilités?

Julien : Oui le terme “Raw” ne veut rien dire d’autre que “données brutes”, donc ça peut aussi s’appliquer au domaine du son.
Voici un Raw de mon D200 sur lequel tu pourras t’amuser : Raw test

By: Tom

Tom — Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:43:16 +0000

Thanks Julien, I think I get your point. May I ask how you got the look on your current Home-Page picture (and some others)? Oh, I guess it’s not that easy…anyway, I think it’s a very strong look, thanks for your site.

Julien : Thank you Tom, I think you will have all answers here

By: Tom

Tom — Sun, 26 Aug 2007 22:55:38 +0000

thanks for your tutorials. i agree raw gives better results, for me the question is, at what print size does it show? do you have any experience on this point?

Julien : I said the Raw format was a better source for post-processing, talking about raw for printing is disturbing for me because Raw is the beginning and Print is the finality ... there are many steps between them. However I think that to have a good print, you need a good post-processing, to have a good post-processing you need a good/rich source and to have a good and rich source you need the Raw.